CROWN WITNESSES AND THE INTEGRITY OF JUSTICE: ETHICAL AND LEGAL REFLECTIONS ON THE FERDY SAMBO CASE IN INDONESIA

Fauziah Lubis; Andi Hakim Lubis; Mhd Nurhusein  Daulay; Mohamad Aniq Aiman Alias

doi:10.33102/mjsl.vol14no2.1402

Authors

Fauziah Lubis Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Jalan Willem Iskandar Pasar V, Medan Estate, Percut Sei Tuan Subdistrict, Deli Serdang Regency, North Sumatra 20371, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7653-8341
Andi Hakim Lubis Faculty of Law, Universitas Medan Area, Jl. Kolam No.1, Kenangan Baru, Percut Sei Tuan Subdistrict, Deli Serdang Regency, North Sumatra 20223, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9573-1100
Mhd Nurhusein Daulay Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Jalan Willem Iskandar Pasar V, Medan Estate, Percut Sei Tuan Subdistrict, Deli Serdang Regency, North Sumatra 20371, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5124-0156
Mohamad Aniq Aiman Alias Faculty of Syariah and Law, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Bandar Baru Nilai, 71800 Nilai Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8417-7152

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol14no2.1402

Keywords:

Crown witness, criminal justice system, Ferdy Sambo case, credibility, fairness

Abstract

This study examines the role of crown witnesses in the Indonesian criminal justice system through the case study of Ferdy Sambo. While crown witnesses have proven effective in uncovering complex criminal networks, their use raises serious issues regarding credibility, bias, and procedural fairness. The research adopts a normative juridical method, employing statutory and case approach, alongside descriptive-analytical analysis based on secondary data such as court decisions, legal literature, and laws and regulations, with conclusions drawn deductively. The findings indicate that crown witness testimony plays a strategic role in exposing organized crime but remains vulnerable to inconsistencies and motives of leniency that may compromise the rights of the accused and the pursuit of material truth. The novelty of this study lies in a critical analysis of the Ferdy Sambo case as a contemporary precedent, revealing the ethical and legal dilemmas surrounding the use of crown witnesses from the perspective of human rights and procedural fairness. Accordingly, the study recommends legal policy reform, including strict statutory limitations on the appointment of crown witnesses in criminal cases, enhanced training for judges and prosecutors, and strengthened legal protections for both crown witnesses and defendants to avoid pressure and manipulation when giving testimony.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adhani, N. (2023). Kedudukan Justice Collaborator dalam peradilan pidana pembunuhan berencana pada kasus Richard Eliezer (Skripsi, Universitas Islam Indonesia). Repository UII.

Alias, M. A. A., Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Baharuddin, A. S., Hashim, H., & Mallow, M. S. (2025a). An appraisal of the legal framework governing the admissibility of electronic documents as evidence in Malaysian Shariah courts: Current practices and future legal directions. IIUM Law Journal, 33(2), 69–108. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v33i2.1077

Alias, M. A. A., Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Baharuddin, A. S., Hashim, H., & Tuan Ibrahim, T. M. F. H. (2025b). Digital forensics and the admissibility of electronic evidence in Malaysian Syariah courts: Towards a standardised legal framework. LexForensica: Forensic Justice and Socio-Legal Research Journal, 2(1), 84-91. https://doi.org/10.33102/6grx4619

Alketbi, A. S. S., & Kanaker, O. (2025). Dawr al-i‘lām al-raqamī fī tashkīl al-huwiyyah al-waṭaniyyah: dirāsah muqāranah bayna al-Imārāt wa-Mālīziyā fī ḍaw’ al-siyāsāt al-i‘lāmiyyah:The role of digital media in shaping national identity: A comparative study between the United Arab Emirates and Malaysia in light of media policies. Law, Policy and Social Science, 4(1), 132–153. https://doi.org/10.55265/lpssjournal.v4i1.52

Allen, R. J., Hoffmann, J. L., Livingston, D. A., Leipold, A. D., & Meares, T. L. (2020). Criminal procedure: Investigation and the right to counsel (4th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

Al-Shaddadi, S. M. S. A., Abdul Rab, M. A., & Abdul Halim, M. A. (2025). Ḥujjiyyat al-kitābah al-iliktirūniyyah lil-ʿuqūd al-idāriyyah fī al-tashrīʿ al-imārātī wa-al-muqāran: The evidentiary value of electronic writing in administrative contracts under UAE and comparative legislation. Law, Policy, and Social Science, 4(1), 201–235. https://doi.org/10.55265/lpssjournal.v4i1.86

Anggasakti, T. (2016). Penggunaan saksi mahkota dalam pembuktian perkara pembunuhan berencana berdasar asas praduga tidak bersalah (presumption of innocence). Jurnal Verstek, 4(2), 112–121.

Azizi, A. H. (2022). Pertimbangan hakim dalam dugaan rekayasa kasus tindak pidana pembunuhan berencana (Bachelor's thesis, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta). Institutional Repository UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.

Chaerudin, M. A. Y. C., Maskur, A., & Adila, A. H. (2025). Prinsip keadilan prosedural sebagai landasan pertimbangan hakim dalam kasus pencurian ayam. Jurnal USM Law Review, 8(1), 509–529.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dewi, I. A. K. C., Dewi, A. A. S. L., & Widyantara, I. M. M. (2023). Kedudukan saksi mahkota dalam proses pembuktian tindak pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 4(2), 124–129. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.4.2.7138.124-129

Fikriyah, A., Masyhar, A., & Wulandari, C. (2023). Justice Collaborator dalam pertimbangan hakim memutus perkara. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 53(3), 513–520. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol53.no3.3412

Fuady, M. (2012). Teori hukum pembuktian pidana dan perdata. PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Fyfe, N., & Sheptycki, J. (2005). Facilitating witness co-operation in organised crime cases: An international review. Home Office Online Report.

Ghonu, I., Sofyan, A. M., & Azisa, N. (2018). The role of the crown witness in the process of proving criminal cases in Indonesia. Musamus Law Review, 1(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.35724/mularev.v1i1.921

Grosso, C. M., & O’Brien, B. (2017). Grounding criminal procedure. The Journal of Gender, Race & Justice, 20(1), 53–82.

Hakim, N. W., & Anam, A. K. (2020). Implementasi konsep keadilan dengan sistem negatif wettelijk dan asas kebebasan hakim dalam memutus suatu perkara pidana ditinjau dari Pasal 1 Undang-Undang No. 4 Tahun 2004 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(1), 45–60.

Hammar, R. K. R., & Renjaan, H. (2022). The role of common law in the criminal justice system regarding capital punishments in Indonesia: An evaluation of the legal framework and implications. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 17(1), 287–298.

Hardum, S. E. (2024). Kajian yuridis perlindungan hukum terhadap saksi mahkota dalam mengungkapkan kasus pidana. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP), 4(5), 612–625.

Hiariej, E. O. S. (2024). Prinsip-prinsip hukum pidana: Edisi penyesuaian KUHP Nasional. Rajawali Pers.

Husin, K., & Husin, B. R. (2022). Sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Jacobs, J. A., & Jackson, J. (Eds.). (2017). The Routledge handbook of criminal justice ethics. Routledge.

Lippman, M. (2020). Law and society (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Meita, A. D. (2024). Analisis framing pada pemberitaan kasus pembunuhan Ferdy Sambo di media online Kumparan.com dan Tribunnews.com. Da’watuna: Journal of Communication and Islamic Broadcasting, 4(1), 393–407. https://doi.org/10.47467/dawatuna.v4i1.3811

Meita, A. D. (2024). Analisis framing pada pemberitaan kasus pembunuhan Ferdy Sambo di media online Kumparan.com dan Tribunnews.com. Da’watuna: Journal of Communication and Islamic Broadcasting, 4(1), 393–407.

Morgan, E. M. (1946). The law of evidence, 1941–1945. Harvard Law Review, 59(4), 481–576.

Muharikin, I. M. (2015). Kedudukan saksi mahkota dalam proses peradilan pidana di Indonesia berdasarkan asas non-self incrimination (Master's thesis, Universitas Brawijaya). UB Repository.

Mulyadi, L. (2007). Pembalikan beban pembuktian tindak pidana korupsi. PT Alumni.

Mulyati, N. (2025). Kepastian hukum penggunaan saksi mahkota dalam pembuktian pidana ditinjau dari asas hak terdakwa tidak boleh mendakwa dirinya sendiri (non self incrimination). UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, 8(4), 725–734.

Ningsih, S. A., & Aryati, R. (2025). Kedudukan hukum saksi mahkota sebagai alat bukti dalam peradilan tindak pidana korupsi berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Hukum Acara Pidana. Pagaruyuang Law Journal, 8(2), 33–42.

Nufus, W. H. (2022, November 30). “Babak baru sidang pembunuhan Yosua, Eliezer-Kuat-Ricky saling bersaksi. Detiknews”. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6434189/babak-baru-sidang-pembunuhan-yosua-eliezer-kuat-ricky-saling-bersaksi

Palguna, F. A. (2022, December 16). “Saling tuding memberi kesaksian palsu di sidang Ferdy Sambo cs, ini kata pakar hukum”. Tempo. https://www.tempo.co/hukum/saling-tuding-memberi-kesaksian-palsu-di-sidang-ferdy-sambo-cs-ini-kata-pakar-hukum-239019

Perdana, G. P., & Susanti, R. (2023). Perlindungan hukum terhadap Justice Collaborator dalam kasus pembunuhan berencana (Studi pada kasus Richard Eliezer). Wijayakusuma Law Review, 5(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.51926/wlr.v5i1.132

Sasmito, I. A. (2012). Kajian teoritik dualisme dasar hukum penghadiran kroongetuige dan nilai pembuktian berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana. Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 41(3), 382–391.

Semendawai, A. H. (2016). Penetapan status justice collaborator bagi tersangka atau terdakwa dalam perspektif hak asasi manusia. Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(3), 468–490.

Sukarjono, B., Chairani, M. A., Pradhana, A. P., & Ardiani, L. (2023). Peranan saksi mahkota dalam perkara tindak pidana kasus pembunuhan berencana Brigadir Joshua dikaitkan dengan asas non self incrimination. Yustisia Merdeka: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 9(1), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.33319/yust.v9i1.102

Syafii, U. A. (2023). Perlindungan hukum oleh Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban (LPSK) dan implikasinya terhadap peran Justice Collaborator dalam mengungkap kejahatan (UIN Walisongo). Institutional Repository UIN Walisongo.

Syam, N. R., Marsuni, L., & Arsyad, N. (2023). Tinjauan hukum terhadap saksi pelaku yang bekerjasama (Justice Collaborator) dalam proses persidangan di Indonesia. Journal of Lex Theory (JLT), 4(2), 378–390.

Wan Ismail, W. A. F., Baharuddin, A. S., Abdul Mutalib, L.,& Alias, M. A. A. (2021). A systematic analysis on the admissibility of digital documents as evidence in Malaysian Syariah courts. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 29(3), 1981-1996.

Wijaya, F. (2012). Whistleblower dan Justice Collaborator dalam perspektif hukum. Penaku.

Williams, G. (1962). Criminal law: The general part (2nd ed.). Stevens & Sons.

Yahyanto, Y. (2019). The contribution of human rights in thinking on renewing the Book of Law of Criminal Events (code). Justicia Islamica, 16(2), 395–426. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v16i2.1691

Yuwono, S. T. (2011). Kajian kedudukan dan nilai pembuktian saksi mahkota sebagai alat bukti dalam pembuktian tindak pidana korupsi (Master's thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret). UNS Digital Library.