RED SEA CRISIS AND THE PROBLEM OF FRUSTRATED CONTRACTS

Ahmad Hussein Alsharqawi; Nabeel Mahdi Althabhawi; Haniff Ahamat; Abd Alhade Mossa Hasan Rshdan

doi:10.33102/mjsl.vol14no1.1008

Authors

Ahmad Hussein Alsharqawi Faculty of Law, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
Nabeel Mahdi Althabhawi Faculty of Law, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
Haniff Ahamat Faculty of Law, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
Abd Alhade Mossa Hasan Rshdan Faculty of Law, Amman Arab University, Amman 11953, Jordan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol14no1.1008

Keywords:

Red Sea Crisis, frustration, change of circumstances, pacta sunt servanda, rebus sic stantibus

Abstract

The Red Sea Crisis, triggered by Houthi attacks on commercial vessels from October 2023, has disrupted one of the world’s most strategic maritime corridors and exposed significant legal uncertainty in international commercial contracts. This article examines the doctrine of frustration under English law in the context of disruptions affecting shipping, logistics, insurance and the sale of goods. It asks whether the increased cost, delay and risk caused by rerouting vessels through the Cape of Good Hope can amount to a frustrating event or whether such consequences remain within the ordinary commercial risks assumed by contracting parties. Employing a doctrinal legal methodology based on statutory analysis, case law and contemporary legal literature, the study traces the historical development of frustration from its strict common law foundations to its modern application in maritime and commercial disputes. The study contributes to existing scholarship in three main respects. First, it situates the Red Sea Crisis within the wider legal history of maritime disruptions, including earlier Suez Canal cases, thereby clarifying the relevance of established precedents to current trade conditions. Second, it demonstrates that the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943 offers only a limited remedial framework, because it focuses mainly on post-discharge adjustment rather than preserving or rebalancing continuing contractual relationships. Third, it distinguishes frustration from force majeure and hardship clauses, showing that contractual risk-allocation mechanisms may provide greater flexibility than the doctrine itself. The article argues that Red Sea-related disputes are unlikely to satisfy the high threshold of frustration unless performance becomes radically different, not merely more expensive or delayed. It concludes by calling for a more coherent interpretative approach and renewed consideration of statutory reform to enhance certainty, fairness and commercial predictability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al Majed, B., & Al Majed, A. (2024). Frustration v imprévision, why frustration is so ‘frustrating’: The lack of flexibility in the English doctrine’s legal consequence. Liverpool Law Review, 45(1), 25–48.

Aldalbeeh, A., & Alsharqawi, A. (2023). Cyber terrorism and its role in the outbreak of international crisis. International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics, 15(1), 24–32.

Al-Dlabeeh, A., Alsharqawi, A. H., Al Kloub, R., & Karabsheh, A.-K. O. (2022). The role of international criminal law in violations of the environment during armed conflict. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 13(3), 643–648.

Al-Khawaldah, M. H. A., Al Makhmari, M. R. A., Al Mamari, S. A. H., Al Haf, R. A., & Alsharqawi, A. H. (2023). Penal liability for the oil leak incident “heavy fuel” in the Jordanian Port of Aqaba and its impact on the environment. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 14(3), 754–758. https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.14.3(67).14

Almási, A. (1922). The spread of economic impossibility. Jogtudományi Közlöny, 15, 113–115.

Alsharqawi, A., & Younes, A. S. (2020). Regulating the UK financial system post-crisis under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 as amended. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 23(5), 1–9.

Alsharqawi, A., Alghathian, G. A., & Younes, A. S. (2020). International arbitration: Law and practice under dispute settlement understanding. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 23(6), 1–10.

Alsharqawi, A., Hamdan, A. B., & Anzeh, M. A. (2021). The role of General Assembly resolutions to the development of international law. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24(2), 1–6.

Badi’ Mansour, S. (1995). Constancy and change in the legal base. Al-Razi Library for Services.

Baker, J. H. (1979). From sanctity of contract to reasonable expectations? Current Legal Problems, 32, 17–34.

Benson, P. (2019). Justice in transactions. Harvard University Press.

Carter, J. W. (2018). Contract law in Australia (7th ed.). Lexis Nexis.

Chapman, T. (1960). Contracts: Frustration of purpose. Michigan Law Review, 59(1), 98–122.

Dagan, H., & Heller, M. (2025). The autonomy default paradigm in contract law (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 4754123). Social Science Research Network.

David, R., & Brierley, J. E. C. (1985). Major legal systems in the world today: An introduction to the comparative study of law. Stevens & Sons.

Diakun, B., & Raanan, T. (2023, December 15). Houthis target tenth ship in Red Sea as attacks turn increasingly indiscriminate. Lloyd's List. Archived from the original on January 12, 2024.

El Gammal, M. (1969). The adaptation of the contract to economic circumstances. Comparative Studies of Civil Law.

Elisabetta, P. (2024). Red Sea attacks disrupt global shipping as Houthi threats escalate. The New York Times, 2024.

Elliott, C., & Quinn, F. (2019). Elliott & Quinn’s Contract Law. Pearson.

El-Refaie, A. M., & Alsharqawi, A. H. (2022). Legislative confrontation of the crime of environmental pollution in Jordan. Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 14(1), 29–42.

El-Refaie, A. M., Aldalbeeh, A., & Alsharqawi, A. (2021). The extent of bound or unbound United Nations Security Council by law. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24(4), 1–7.

Fidelma, W. (2013). Sale of goods law reform: An Irish perspective. Common Law World Review, 42(2), 172–190.

Guest, A.G. (2023). Guest on the law of sale of goods. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

Hegel, G. W. H. (1820). Philosophy of right. Oxford University Press.

Juhasz, A. (2019). Some issues in treating the changes of circumstances under English law. Pro Futuro – Law of the Future Generations, 3, 25–44.

Juwaihan, M., Abu Issa, H., and Khater, M. N. (2025). The crime of counterfeiting or imitating a trademark under Jordanian trademarks law. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 28, 589–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12346

Krückmann, P. (1918). Clausula rebus sic stantibus, war clause, strike clause. Archiv für die civilistische Praxis, 2–3, 157–481.

Lee, J. M. Y., & Wong, Y. C. E. (2021). Suez canal blockage: An analysis of legal impact, risks and liabilities on the global supply chain. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Transport System and Maritime Logistics (ISTSML 2021) (pp. 1-13). Batumi, Georgia.

MacMillan, C. (2014). English contract law and the Great War: The development of a doctrine of frustration. Comparative Legal History, 2(2), 278–302.

Manasra, M. W., Al Mamari, S. A. H., Gharibeh, A., Najm, M., Younes, A. S., & Alsharqawi, A. H. (2022). Tort liability for environmental pollution. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 13(5), 1294–1299. https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v13.5(61).07

Mazzacano, F. (2012). Frustration of contract and the allocation of risk under English law. Journal of Business Law, 2012, 473–489.

McCamus, J. D. (2020). The law of contracts (3rd ed.). Irwin Law.

McKendrick, E. (2025). Contract law (16th ed.). Hart Publishing.

McKenzie, E. (2021). Legal implications of the Suez Canal blockage: The doctrine of frustration revisited. Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, 52(3), 45–67.

Notteboom, T. E. (2012). Towards a new intermediate hub region in container shipping? Relay and interlining via the Cape route vs. the Suez route. Journal of Transport Geography, 22(2), 164–178.

Partington, R. (2024, January 3). What is the Red Sea crisis, and what does it mean for global trade?. The Guardian.

Peari, S., & Golestani, Z. R. (2022). A theory of frustration and its effect. Liverpool Law Review, 43, 263–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-022-09305-7

Peel, E. (2020). Treitel on the law of contract. Sweet & Maxwell.

Ramsden, W. A. (1977). Temporary supervening impossibility of performance. South African Law Journal, 94, 162–182.

Rösler, H. (2007). Hardship in German codified private law: In comparative perspective to English, French and international contract law. European Review of Private Law, 4, 497–522.

Scanferla, E. (2024, June 27). “The Red Sea crisis: Contractual remedies available to the parties”. Safety4Sea. https://safety4sea.com/the-red-sea-crisis-contractual-remedies-available-to-the-parties/

Schuster, R. (1923). A few words on the issue of economic impossibility. Jogtudományi Közlöny, 1, 2–4.

Sérafin, S. (2022). Transfer theory and the assignment of contractual rights. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 60(2), 251-288.

Stewart, A., & Carter, J. W. (1992). Frustrated contracts and statutory adjustment: The case for a reappraisal. Cambridge Law Journal, 51(1), 66–96.

Treitel, G. (2004). Frustration and force majeure (2nd ed.). Sweet & Maxwell.

Treitel, G. (2007). The law of contract. Sweet & Maxwell.

Verny, J., & Grigentin, C. (2009). Container shipping on the Northern Sea Route. International Journal of Production Economics, 122(1), 107–117.

World Bank. (2024, April). “Dire Strait: The far-reaching impact of the Red Sea shipping crisis (Issue #1)”. World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099414105062418860/pdf/IDU1a1491aa617394148a91856c1eaa57a28f15b.pdf

Yerushalmy, J. (2023). Red Sea shipping crisis drives up oil and gas prices amid Houthi attacks. The Guardian.

Younes, A. S., & Alsharqawi, A. H. (2021). The legal education experience during the COVID-19 pandemic. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11(6), 1029–1036.