MALAYSIAN COMMUNICATION AND MULTIMEDIA COMMISSION'S (MCMC) LAW ENFORCEMENT SPECTRUM: EXPLORING ARREST AUTHORITY

Mimi Sofiah Ahmad Mustafa; Yuhanza Othman; Nasihah Naimat; Ida Rahayu Mahat; Marziana Abd Malib; Mohd Ab Malek Md Shah; Muhammad Arif Haron

doi:10.33102/mjsl.vol13no2.1102

Authors

Mimi Sofiah Ahmad Mustafa Department of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Melaka Kampus, KM 26, Jalan Lendu, 78000 Alor Gajah, Malacca, Malaysia
Yuhanza Othman Department of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Melaka Kampus, KM 26, Jalan Lendu, 78000 Alor Gajah, Malacca, Malaysia
Nasihah Naimat Department of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Melaka Kampus, KM 26, Jalan Lendu, 78000 Alor Gajah, Malacca, Malaysia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1154-2038
Ida Rahayu Mahat Department of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Melaka Kampus, KM 26, Jalan Lendu, 78000 Alor Gajah, Malacca, Malaysia
Marziana Abd Malib Department of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Melaka Kampus, KM 26, Jalan Lendu, 78000 Alor Gajah, Malacca, Malaysia
Mohd Ab Malek Md Shah Department of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Melaka Kampus, KM 26, Jalan Lendu, 78000 Alor Gajah, Malacca, Malaysia
Muhammad Arif Haron Melaka Malaysian Communication and Multimedia Commission, No. 24-4, Aras 4, Bangunan Kota Cemerlang, Hang Tuah Jaya, 75450, Lebuh Ayer Keroh, Melaka, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol13no2.1102

Keywords:

MCMC, issues, scam, power of arrest, jurisdiction

Abstract

The Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) regulates multimedia and communication activities and plays a role in protecting consumers from harms such as online scams and digital fraud. However, it is rather ironic that the unit mandated to receive public complaints about scams does not have the power to make an arrest upon the presentation of sufficient proof, a task that often rests with the Royal Malaysian Police Department (RMPD). Therefore, this study examines a key enforcement gap in the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission’s (MCMC) role, specifically its lack of arrest powers when handling scam-related complaints. It highlights the challenges this limitation poses and proposes the inclusion of arrest authority to strengthen MCMC’s enforcement effectiveness. In doing so, this study employed a qualitative research method in which data were collected through semi-structured interviews conducted with officers from the MCMC, the RMPD, and the Ministry of Communications and Multimedia. Secondary data were gathered from internet sources, relevant legislations, and journals to illustrate the law in this area. Upon analysing the primary and secondary data, the researchers found that it is imperative to grant arrest power to the MCMC due to the challenges encountered in carrying out its tasks. The outcomes of this study can facilitate the Parliament in passing a law to confer the power of arrest to the MCMC through the current legislation, thus reducing the burden of the RMPD in making arrests related to media and communication cases. The public directly benefits from this study as it raises their confidence to lodge complaints with the MCMC, knowing fully well that the commission possesses the power to make an immediate arrest.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad Masum, M. H. A., & S. M. M. N. (2021). Covid-19 and freedom of movement: A case study of the Malaysian Federal Constitution. Legal Network Series, 1, 1–17.

Ahmad, R., & Ismail, A. (2018). Personal data protection in Malaysia: The 2017 mobile phone data breach. Malaysian Journal of Law and Society, 12(2), 76–89.

Ahmad, R., & Nordin, S. (2018). Administrative powers of MCMC: Examining licensing and sanctioning abilities under Malaysian law. International Journal of Regulation and Governance, 18(1), 67–83.

Akhtar, Z. (2022). Montesquieu's theory of the separation of powers, legislative flexibility and judicial restraint in an unwritten constitution. Amicus Curiae, 4(3), 552–577.

Alnifie, K. M., & Kim, C. (2023). Appraising the manifestation of optimism bias and its impact on human perception of cyber security: A meta-analysis. Journal of Information Security, 14(2), 93–110.

Anwary, I. (2022). The role of public administration in combating cybercrime: An analysis of the legal framework in Indonesia. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 16(2), 216–227.

Australian Federal Police. (2024). “Global sting sees Australian offenders arrested for cybercrime and phishing attacks”. https://www.afp.gov.au/news-centre/media-release/global-sting-sees-australian-offenders-arrested-cybercrime-and-phishing

Bada, M., & Nurse, J. R. (2020). The social and psychological impact of cyberattacks. In Emerging cyber threats and cognitive vulnerabilities (pp. 73–92). Academic Press.

Barberis, M., & Sardo, A. (2024). The separation of powers: Old, new, and newest. In Research handbook on legal evolution (pp. 263–275). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Bidin, A., & Khan, S. (2022). Compatibility analysis of Malaysian civil and Syariah laws to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Suhakam.

Bolívar, M. P. R., Galera, A. N., & Muñoz, L. A. (2015). Governance, transparency and accountability: An international comparison. Journal of Policy Modeling, 37(1), 136–174.

Brady, H. E. (2019). The challenge of big data and data science. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 297–323.

Chetry, A., & Sharma, U. (2023). Anonymity in decentralized apps: Study of implications for cybercrime investigations. International Journal of Experimental Research and Review, 32, 195–205.

Clifford, R. D. (2011). Cybercrime: The investigation, prosecution and defense of a computer-related crime (3rd ed.). Carolina Academic Press.

Cohen, G. (2018). Cultural fragmentation as a barrier to interagency collaboration: A qualitative examination of Texas law enforcement officers’ perceptions. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(8), 886–901.

Davis, J. T. (2012). Examining perceptions of local law enforcement in the fight against crimes with a cyber component. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 35(2), 272–284.

De Hert, P. (2016). Accountability mechanisms for regulatory agencies with law enforcement powers: A legal analysis. European Journal of Public Law, 22(1), 101–119.

Dube, D., & Bedi, S. (Eds.). (2021). Arrest and detention in India: Law, procedure and practice. SAGE Publishing India.

Dudley, S. E., & Wegrich, K. (2015). The role of transparency in regulatory governance: Comparing US and EU regulatory systems. Journal of Risk Research, 19(9), 1141–1157.

European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2018). Regulation (EU) 2018/1240 of 12 September 2018 establishing a European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS) and amending Regulations (EU) No 1077/2011, (EU) No 515/2014, (EU) 2016/399, (EU) 2016/1624, and (EU) 2017/2226. Official Journal of the European Union, L 236, 1–71.

Familoni, B. T. (2024). Cybersecurity challenges in the age of AI: Theoretical approaches and practical solutions. Computer Science & IT Research Journal, 5(3), 703–724.

Fisher, R. P., Ross, S. J., & Cahill, B. S. (2017). Interviewing witnesses and victims. In Forensic psychology in context (pp. 56–74). Willan.

Fox, J. (2007). The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in Practice, 17(4–5), 663–671.

Fuad, K. T. (2020, May 9). “Overview: On arrests (rights and restrictions)”. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/overview-arrests-rights-restrictions-tiara-katrina-fuad/

Harmon, R. A. (2016). Why arrest. Michigan Law Review, 115(30), 307–359.

Hashim, N. (2013). The need for a dynamic jurisprudence of right to “life” under Article 5(1) of the Federal Constitution. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 101, 299–306.

Hawdon, J. (2021). Cybercrime: Victimization, perpetration, and techniques. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 46(6), 837–842.

Henrina, J., Lim, M. A., & Pranata, R. (2021). COVID-19 and misinformation: How an infodemic fuelled the prominence of vitamin D. British Journal of Nutrition, 125(3), 359–360.

Héritier, A., & Karremans, J. (2021). Introduction: Regulating finance in Europe: Policy effects and political accountability. In Regulating finance in Europe (pp. 1–15). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Islam, A. K. M. N., Laato, S., Talukder, M. S., & Sutinen, E. (2020). Misinformation sharing and social media fatigue during COVID-19: An affordance and cognitive load perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 159, 1–14.

Kee, C. P., Nie, K. S., Korff, R., & Helbardt, S. (2015). Malaysia’s contemporary broadcast media regulation through the eyes of regulators. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 25(2), 231–242.

Kitsiou, A., Sideri, M., Pantelelis, M., Simou, S., Mavroeidi, A. G., Vgena, K., & Kalloniatis, C. (2024). Specification of self-adaptive privacy-related requirements within cloud computing environments (CCE). Sensors, 24(10), 1–23.

Koziarski, J., & Lee, J. R. (2020). Connecting evidence-based policing and cybercrime. Policing: An International Journal, 43(1), 198–211.

Mabillard, V. (2022). Trust in government: Assessing the impact of exposure to information in a local context. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(9), 687–696.

MCMC. (2013). “Annual report 2013”. Malaysian Government Document Archives. https://govdocs.sinarproject.org/documents/ministry-of-science-technology-and-innovation/malaysia-communications-and-multimedia-commission-mcmc/mcmc-annual-repor2013_bm.pdf/view

Mohamad, A. R. B., Yaakop, M. R., & Razif, M. A. B. M. (2024). The efficacy of the Malaysian government’s response towards cybercrime. Open Journal of Political Science, 14(1), 166–176.

Mulgan, R. (2000). ‘Accountability’: An ever-expanding concept?. Public Administration, 78(3), 555–573.

MyCERT. (2025, February 22). “MyCERT advisory - SR-029.022025”. Malaysian Computer Emergency Response Team. https://www.mycert.org.my/portal/advisory?id=SR-029.022025

Persadha, P. D., Waskita, A. A., & Yazid, S. (2015, October). Comparative study of cyber security policies among Malaysia, Australia, Indonesia: A responsibility perspective. In 2015 Fourth International Conference on Cyber Security, Cyber Warfare, and Digital Forensic (CyberSec) (pp. 146–150). IEEE.

Rahim, S. H. A., & Pawanteh, L. (2019). The role and challenges of the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission in digital regulation. Malaysian Journal of Communication, 35(4), 91–108.

Saripan, H., Hassan, R. A., Hashim, N., Salleh, A. S. M., Putera, N. S. F. M. S., & Nasrun, M. (2022). Unveiling the risks of corruption in the Malaysian telecommunication sector. NeuroQuantology, 20(12), 1889–1902.

Shariff, S. Z. M., & Kosmin, R. (2015). Regulating content in broadcasting, media and the internet: A case study on public understanding of their role on self-regulation in Malaysia. International Journal of Education and Social Science, 2(4), 58–69.

Shukurov, E., & Jafarov, U. U. (2023). Legal professionals' perspectives on the challenges of cybercrime legislation enforcement. Interdisciplinary Studies in Society, Law, and Politics, 2(4), 25–31.

Sihabudin, S. (2023). Expanding the limitations of the protection and processing of children’s personal data: An overview of current regulations, challenges, and recommendations. Brawijaya Law Journal, 10(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2023.010.01.04

Sreedharam, R. K., & Ramayah, B. (2020). Sedition law and the bloggers' freedom of expression in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Law & Society, 26, 85–96.

Stasavage, D. (2020). The decline and rise of democracy: A global history from antiquity to today. Princeton University Press.

Stechschulte, N. (2022, June 21). “Can the SEC file criminal charges?”. Stechschulte Nell Law. https://www.tpatrialattorneys.com/sec-criminal-charges/

Straits Times. (2017, October 31). “Malaysia data breach puts personal details of 46.2 million mobile subscribers at stake”. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/malaysia-data-breach-puts-personal-details-of-462-million-mobile-subscribers-at-stake

Tregidga, H., Kearins, K., & Collins, E. (2019). Towards transparency? Analysing the sustainability governance practices of ethical certification. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 39(1), 44–69.

Uzougbo, N. S., Ikegwu, C. G., & Adewusi, A. O. (2024). International enforcement of cryptocurrency laws: Jurisdictional challenges and collaborative solutions. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 11(1), 68–83.

Zubaidi, N. H. A. (2021). Monitoring internet child pornography (ICP) in Malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 29(2), 185–203.