THE INFLUENCE OF MALIKI JURISPRUDENCE ON THE FRENCH CIVIL LAW IN TERMS OF THE OPPOSABILITY OF THE RELATIVE EFFECT OF CONTRACT TO THIRD PARTIES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol13no1.1157

Keywords:

Islamic Shariah, Maliki school, indirect action, Paul’s case, contracts

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative study of the stances of Maliki jurisprudence and French civil law regarding the opposability of the effects of contracts on non-contracting parties. The study focuses on three central claims that serve as exceptions to the principle of the relativity of contract effects: the indirect action, the Paulian action, and the action for declaration of simulation. This paper employs a qualitative methodology that combines analytical and inductive approaches. It draws on primary sources of Maliki jurisprudence, French legal codes, and contemporary legal studies to examine the historical trends and practical applications of these mechanisms in law. The paper demonstrates how Maliki jurisprudence, despite its origins in a distinct historical context, has offered a sophisticated approach to these issues through the application of flexible and comprehensive rules that fundamentally comply with the established tenets of modern French civil law, particularly in protecting creditors’ rights and regulating the effects of contracts on third parties. The study highlights a significant convergence between Maliki jurisprudence and French civil law regarding sources, foundational principles, and legal structures. While Maliki jurisprudence relies on general and flexible principles, French civil law establishes more precise and codified rules. Despite these differences, their substantial overlap offers a valuable opportunity to integrate elements of Maliki jurisprudence into French civil laws. Such an integration could enhance transactional fairness and strengthen the protection of contracting parties' interests.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abumalik, T., Al Saidat, E., & Al-Shudaifat, A. (2023). The case for the ineffectiveness of debtors' disposition of the creditor's right (Paulian action) in Jordanian civil law. The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies, 11(6), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.24940/theijhss/2023/v11/i6/hs2306-007

Adunola, A. R. A. W. (2019). The harmonisation of Shariah and civil law in the area of contract with special reference to the remedies for anticipatory breach of contract. International Journal of ‘Umranic Studies, 2(1), 11–18.

Al-Dardir, A. M. (2013). Al-Syarh al-Saghir. Dar Ibn Hazm.

Al-Dusuqi, M. (2021). Principles of Maliki jurisprudence in contractual relations. Al-Risalah Publishing House.

Algerian Civil Code. (2005). Algerian legislation, Ordinance No. 75-58 of September 26, 1975.

Al-Khattab, A. (1995). Mawahib al-jalil fi sharh mukhtasar Khalil. Dar Al-Fikr.

Al-Qarafi, S. (2020). The influence of Islamic jurisprudence on modern law. Dar Al-Kutub.

Al-Sanhuri, A. (2019). General theory of obligations in Islamic and French law. Albin Michel.

Al-Shatibi, Abu Ishaq. (2017). Al-Muwafaqat fi Usul al-Shari‘ah. Marrakesh: Al-Bashir Benaatiya Publications.

Al-Zuhayli, W. (2020). Foundations of Islamic jurisprudence: Modern applications in civil law. International Islamic Center for Legal Research.

Carbonnier, J. (2020). Relational theories in contracts: Principles and disputes. McGraw Hill.

Dusuqi, M. A. (n.d.). Hashiyat al-dusuqi 'ala al-sharh al-kabir (dusuqi’s marginal notes on al-sharh al-kabir). Dar al-Fikr.

Faizi, H. F. S., & Alib, H. S. (2024). The core principles of Islamic jurisprudence within legal theory: A comprehensive analysis. Online Journal of Research in Islamic Studies, 11(2), 57–72.

Fala, N., & Poalelungi, M. (2024). The delimitation of the Paulian action from other methods of defending subjective civil rights. Studii Juridice Universitare, 2(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.54481/sju.2023.2.06

Flour, J., & Aubert, J. (2020). Contractual relativity in European legal systems: Historical and modern perspectives. Oxford University Press.

French Civil Code. (2021). Code civil, Paris: Legifrance.

Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani. (2017). Bulugh al-maram min adillat al-ahkam. Darussalam.

Ibn Juzayy, A. (2019). Al-qawanin al-fiqhiyyah: The judgments of fiqh. Diwan Press.

Ibn Rushd. (2015). Bidayat al-mujtahid wa-nihayat al-muqtasid. Resalah.

Malaurie, P., & Aynès, L. (2021). Modern civil law and contract theories: A comparative perspective. LexisNexis.

Mazeaud, H., & Chabas, F. (2020). Practical applications of contract law in modern legal systems. Springer.

Planiol, M., & Ripert, G. (2020). The evolution of obligations: From Roman law to modern codes. Cambridge University Press.

Samad, D. A., & Al-Qubaty, M. A. A. R. (2017). The objectives of Islamic Sharia and Islamic political thought: The concept, historical development and their dimensional interrelationships. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 5(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol5no2.71

Terré, F., & Simler, P. (2020). French civil law: Principles and practices. Paris: Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence (LGDJ), Lextenso Éditions.

Van Ommeslaghe, P. (2010). Law of obligations: General regime of the obligation. Bruylant.

Vaquer, A. (2009). From revocation to non-opposability: Modern developments of the Paulian action. In H. L. MacQueen, A. Vaquer, & S. Espiau Espiau (Eds.), Regional private laws and codification in Europe (pp. 225–241). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511495007.010

Yassine, C., Ahmad, A., Muhtar, M. H., Rivera, K. M., & Putri, V. S. (2024). Admissibility of lawsuits based on interest under Algerian civil and administrative procedures. Jambura Law Review, 6(2), 286–303. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v6i2.24309

Zakaria, M. Z. (2018). The application of true sale contract in asset-backed sukuk. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 6(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol6no1.97

Published

2025-04-30

How to Cite

THE INFLUENCE OF MALIKI JURISPRUDENCE ON THE FRENCH CIVIL LAW IN TERMS OF THE OPPOSABILITY OF THE RELATIVE EFFECT OF CONTRACT TO THIRD PARTIES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY. (2025). Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 13(1), 123-133. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol13no1.1157