LEGAL POLICY FOR RESOLVING LAND CORRUPTION IN INDONESIA: PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES

Authors

  • Vani Wirawan Master of Islamic Development and Public Policy, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga, Sleman, Depok 55281, Indonesia
  • Ajeng Zulaikha Ngatiyah Master of Notary, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Sleman, Depok 55281, Indonesia
  • Vani Novianto Master of Development Economics, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Sleman, Depok 55281, Indonesia
  • Yeni Widowaty Master of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Bantul, Kasihan 55183, Indonesia
  • Deni Setiyawan Master of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik, Gresik, Kebomas 61121, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol14no1.1183

Keywords:

Resolving, PTSL, corruption, eradication, problems, opportunities

Abstract

Despite the ongoing reform period, Indonesia has not made substantial progress in eradicating corruption, especially in the land sector, where entrenched corrupt practices continue to impede the effective implementation of the Complete Systematic Land Registration Program (PTSL Program). This study aims to identify and propose an improved legal framework to address corruption within the PTSL Program, facilitating the development of laws needed for the future eradication of corruption in the land sector. Employing a descriptive and analytical socio-legal approach, this research seeks to produce alternative legal models that can effectively combat corruption in future implementations of the PTSL Program. The proposed legal construction consists of both external and internal conceptual frameworks, which are essential for developing an effective fraud control plan for national strategic land programs, particularly the PTSL Program. It is imperative for the government to undertake a thorough evaluation, revision, and amendment of the regulatory provisions outlined in the Joint Decree of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency, the Minister of Home Affairs, and the Minister of Villages, Development of Disadvantaged Regions, and Transmigration- Numbers 25/SKB/V/2017, Number 590-3167A of 2017, and Number 34 of 2017- Concerning Financing for the Preparation of Systematic Land Registration (referred to as the Decree of the 3 Ministers or SKB Tiga Menteri). Particular attention should be given to the substantive content of the Seventh Dictum. Therefore, it is recommended that the government review, update, or amend the provisions of this Decree,  especially those related to the Seventh Dictum, as well as its implementing regulations, including the Regent Regulation on Financing Standards for the Preparation of Complete Systematic Land Registration, which has been issued across all districts and cities. This legal policy will significantly impact law enforcement against corruption in the ongoing PTSL Program within the broader land certification initiative.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abraham, J., & Pea, A. G. (2020). Can proneness to moral emotions detect corruption? The mediating role of ethical judgment based on unified ethics. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 41(1), 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.07.013

Adams, C., Procter, M., & Rowe, M. (2011). Bureaucracy, corruption, and accountability in historical perspective. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(11), 697–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2011.598260

Aditya, I. (2019, May 14). “Kantor pertanahan Sleman targetkan 30 ribu bidang”. KRJogja. https://www.krjogja.com/berita-lokal/diy/sleman/kantor-pertanahan-sleman-targetkan-30-ribu-bidang/

Aditya, T., Unger, E. M., Berg, C. vd, Bennett, R., Saers, P., Syahid, H. L., Erwan, D., Wits, T., Widjajanti, N., Santosa, P. B., Atunggal, D., Hanafi, I., & Sutejo, D. (2020). Participatory land administration in Indonesia: Quality and usability assessment. Land, 9(3), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9030079

Agung, M. (2024). “Direktori putusan Mahkamah Agung RI”. Mahkamah Agung RI. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/search.html?q=

Aini, Q. (2018). Study of penal and non-penal approach on prevention of corruption in Indonesia. IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies), 3(2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v3i2.17170

Aisyah, Susmiyati, H. R., & Al-Hidayah, R. (2020). Implementasi asas sederhana pendaftaran tanah sistematis lengkap dalam menjamin hak keperdataan. Petitum, 8(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.36090/jh.v8i2.813

Aksan, M. A., & Kusriyah, S. (2020). The role of advocates in assisting the accused of the crime of embezzlement of complete systematic land registration fees (PTSL). Law Development Journal, 2(3), 353–359. https://dx.doi.org/10.30659/ldj.2.3.353-359

Alkostar, A. (2015). Korupsi politik di negara modern. FH UII Press.

Amhimmid, A., Negasi, M. I., & Al-Toumi, A. M. M. (2022). Reparation recommendation in addressing the legal framework of funds recovery aftermath corruption: A study based on Libyan laws. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 10(1), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol10no2.360

Apriani, D., & Bur, A. (2021). Kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hukum dalam sistem publikasi pendaftaran tanah di Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 5(2), 220–239. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v5i2.11

Aprilianto, R. (2020). Penyidikan operasi tangkap tangan pungutan liar pendaftaran tanah. Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian, 14(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.35879/jik.v14i1.204

Arief, B. N., & Muladi. (1992). Bunga rampai hukum pidana. Alumni.

Artello, K., & Albanese, J. S. (2020). Rising to the surface: The detection of public corruption. Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law and Society, 21(1), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.21428/cb6ab371.a9269513

Candra, T. (2018, September 10). “Korupsi dan pertukaran sosial di Indonesia”. Sanglah Institute. https://www.sanglah-institute.org/2018/09/korupsi-dan-pertukaran-sosial-di.html

Cherry, K. (2023, April 10). “Understanding social exchange theory in psychology”. Verywell Mind. https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-social-exchange-theory-2795882

Dwiputrianti, S. (2009). Memahami strategi pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi, 6(3), 256–281. https://doi.org/10.31113/jia.v6i3.364

Edelbacher, M., Kratcoski, P. C., & Dobovsek, B. (2015). Corruption, fraud, organized crime, and the shadow economy. Routledge Taylor.

Garner, B. A. (2010). Black’s law dictionary, abridged. West, a Thomson Reuters Business.

Gunarto, G., Nitiyudo, S., Mashdurohatun, A., & Handoko, W. (2023). Ideal regulation of land registration using land certificate as evidence based on legal certainty. Saudi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(3), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.36348/sjhss.2023.v08i03.006

Hamzah, A. (1991). Korupsi di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Hamzah, A. (2015). Pemberantasan korupsi: Melalui hukum pidana nasional dan internasional. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Handayani, A. A., & Yusriyadi. (2019). Pendaftaran tanah melalui program pendaftaran tanah sistematis lengkap (PTSL). Notarius, 12(1), 537–549.

Hart, N. H. (2001). Anti-corruption strategies in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 37(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/000749101300046519

Herpri. (2018, May 14). “Biaya PTSL tak saklek Rp 150 ribu per bidang”. Radar Jogja. https://radarjogja.co.id/breaking-news/2018/05/14/biaya-ptsl-tak-saklek-rp-150-ribu-per-bidang/

Hidayat, S. N., Karjoko, L., & Hermawan, S. (2020). Discourse on legal expression in arrangements of corruption eradication in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 5(2), 391–418. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v5i2.40670

Hisbullah, R. W., Patittingi, F., & Arisaputra, M. I. (2019). Asas publisitas pada pelaksanaan program nasional agraria dalam rangka mewujudkan efektivitas pelayanan publik. Al-Azhar Islamic Law Review, 1(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.37146/v1i1.8

Istiqamah. (2018). Tinjauan hukum legalisasi aset melalui pendaftaran tanah sistematis lengkap (PTSL) terhadap kepemilikan tanah. Jurisprudentie, 5(1), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.24252/jurisprudentie.v5i2.5814

Juwita, R. (2019). The amendment of anti-corruption law in Indonesia: The contribution to the development of international anti-corruption law. Asian Yearbook of International Law, 25, 130–153. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004501249_007

Kamasa, F. (2014). Kontraterorisme dan perlindungan hak konstitusi warga negara dalam bidang ekonomi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 11(4), 782–804. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1149

Kenedi, J. (2017). Criminal policy dalam negara hukum Indonesia: Upaya mensejahterakan masyarakat. AL-IMARAH: Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Politik Islam, 2(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.29300/imr.v2i1.1026

KPK, A. (2024, September 11). "Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK), jumlah kasus tindak pidana korupsi (TPK) yang ditangani lembaga antikorupsi itu mencapai 1.629 kasus sejak 2004 hingga 11 September 2024". Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. https://kpk.go.id/id

Kriyantono, R., Destrity, N. A., Amrullah, A. A., & Rakhmawati, F. Y. (2017). Management of public relations for supporting the anti-corruption national program in Indonesia. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 15(20), 293–303.

Kusumawati, I., Supriyono, Atmadja, I. S., Hasanah, E., & Cahyati, S. (2020). The role of law enforcement agencies in the effort of corruption prevention and eradication in the perspective of progressive law in Indonesia. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(3), 2492–2501. https://doi.org/10.37200/V24I3/17501

Lestario, A., & Erlina. (2022). Sistem pendaftaran tanah yang memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang sertifikat hak atas tanah di Indonesia. Notary Law Journal, 1(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.32801/nolaj.v1i1.1

Mahkamah Agung RI. (2024). “Direktori putusan Mahkamah Agung RI”. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/search.html?q=

Maisondra. (2022). Semangat aparatur melawan korupsi (Seri manajemen sumber daya manusia aparatur) (Cet. I). Rtujuh Mediaprinting.

Mappatunru, A. M. D. (2021). Unsur memperkaya dan menguntungkan diri sendiri, orang lain atau korporasi dalam tindak pidana korupsi. Jurnal Media Hukum, 9(2), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.59414/jmh.v9i2.430

Mardiyanto, J. (2022). Complete systematic land registration model (PTSL) in acceleration of equal land rights certification. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 15(7), 1211–1215. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2022-007088

Martitah, M., Hidayat, A., Anitasari, R. F., Rahman, M. A. M., & Aini, T. R. (2023). Transformation of the legislative system in Indonesia based on the principles of good legislation. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 8(2), 545–594. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v8i2.69262

Michael Dinan, A., Herlindah, & Arini Jauharoh. (2024). Juridical analysis of the setting of PTSL fees in the context of legal certainty of land rights. Legal Horizons, 23(4), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.54477/lh.25192353.2024.4.pp.9-19

Mietzner, M. (2015). Dysfunction by design: Political finance and corruption in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 47(4), 587–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2015.1079991

Mighfar, S. (2015). Social exchange theory: Telaah konsep George C. Homans tentang teori pertukaran sosial. Jurnal Lisan Al Hal, 9(2), 261–185. https://doi.org/10.35316/lisanalhal.v9i2.98

Moechthar, O., Soelistyowati, & Poespasari, E. D. (2021). Legal knowledge related to land registration and electronic certification of land ownership. Veteran Society: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2(2), 87–109. https://doi.org/10.33005/vsj.v2i2.24

Mujiburohman, D. A. (2018). Potensi permasalahan pendaftaran tanah sistematik lengkap (PTSL). Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan, 4(1), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.31292/jb.v4i1.217

Mulyadi, M. (2011). Penanggulangan tindak pidana korupsi dalam perspektif criminal policy: Corruption reduction in criminal policy perspective. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 8(2), 217–238. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v8i2.356

Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. SAGE Publications.

Pech, L. (2022). The rule of law as a well established and well defined principle of EU law. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 14, 107–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-022-00176-8

Permana, S., & Setiawan, M. (2024). Corruption in the education sector in Indonesia: Reality, causes, and solutions. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 10(2), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v10i2.1326

Permanasari, L., & Ngaisah, S. (2025). Problems in the implementation of complete systematic land registration (PTSL) in Jombang Regency. Journal of Court and Justice, 4(3), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.56943/jcj.v4i3.782

Poerwanto, H., Setiyono, D. J., & Sunardi. (2022). Corruption as a violation of human rights, economic, social and cultural human rights perspective. SSRN Electronic Journal, 5(1), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4223924

Prayitno, A. H., Wahyono, D., & Bagaskoro, M. R. (2024). Abuse of authority by state officials in corruption cases: The case of complete systematic land registration program. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 18(4), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v18no4.3865

Putra, N. R., & Linda, R. (2022). Corruption in Indonesia: A challenge for social changes. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 8(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v8i1.898

Putrisasmita, G. (2023). Kedudukan program pendaftaran tanah sistematis lengkap dalam kerangka reforma agraria untuk mewujudkan kepastian hukum pertanahan di Indonesia. LITRA: Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Tata Ruang dan Agraria, 3(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.23920/litra.v3i1.1466

Rahardjo, S. (2009). Lapisan-lapisan dalam studi hukum. Bayumedia Publishing.

Rahman, R. N. (2024). Problems of complete systematic land registration (PTSL) in the process of land registration in Indonesia. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 4(5), 1446–1458. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i5.480

Rahmawati, N. (2022). Pendaftaran tanah berbasis desa lengkap. Tunas Agraria, 5(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.31292/jta.v5i2.177

Riyadi, B. S., Wibowo, B. R., & Susanti, V. (2020). Culture of corruption politicians’ behavior in parliament and state official during reform government Indonesia (Genealogical study). International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 52–62. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.06

Serbabagus, S. (2017). Unsur dapat merugikan keuangan negara atau perekonomian negara pada pertanggungjawaban tindak pidana korupsi. Lex Journal: Kajian Hukum & Keadilan, 1(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.25139/lex.v1i1.239

Setiadi, W. (2018). Korupsi di Indonesia penyebab, hambatan, solusi dan regulasi. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 15(3), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v15i3.234

Setiawan, I., & Jesaja, C. P. (2022). Analisis perilaku korupsi aparatur pemerintah di Indonesia (Studi pada pengelolaan bantuan sosial di era pandemi Covid-19). Jurnal Media Birokrasi, 4(2), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.33701/jmb.v4i2.2744

Setkab. (2018, January 1). “Kementerian ATR/BPN: Jika PTSL berhasil, sebagian Nawacita bisa dibilang berhasil”. Sekretariat Kabinet Republik Indonesia. https://setkab.go.id/kementerian-atrbpn-jika-ptsl-berhasil-sebagian-nawacita-bisa-dibilang-berhasil/

Sihombing, S. O. (2018). Youth perceptions toward corruption and integrity: Indonesian context. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(2), 299–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.03.004

Sinaga, J. (2016). Law enforcement policy in corruption crimes based on a non-penal approach in the context of legal protection for victims (Doctoral dissertation, University of North Sumatra). USU Repository.

Snape, F. R. (1999). Corruption, collusion and nepotism in Indonesia. Third World Quarterly, 20(3), 589–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436599913703

Soemanto, R., Sudarto, & Sudarsana. (2014). Pemahaman masyarakat tentang korupsi. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 3(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v3i1.10124

Spyromitros, E., & Panagiotidis, M. (2022). The impact of corruption on economic growth in developing countries and a comparative analysis of corruption measurement indicators. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2129368

Su, X., & Ni, X. (2021). Corruption in social relations: Bribe-taking, corruptibility, and corruption risks. Public Administration, 1(2), 481–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12795

Suryadarma, D. (2012). How corruption diminishes the effectiveness of public spending on education in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 48(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2012.654485

Sutisna, S. (2019). “Posisi pemetaan partisipatif dalam program PTSL berbasis partisipasi Masyarakat”. Jaringan Kerja Pemetaan Partisipatif (JKPP). https://jkpp.org/posisi-pemetaan-partisipatif-dalam-program-ptsl/

Suyadi, Y. (2023). Menuntaskan Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap (PTSL) (Cet. II). Sinar Grafika.

Tanri, A., Turisno, B. E., & Prabandari, A. P. (2020). Kepastian hukum hak atas tanah melalui pendaftaran tanah sistematis lengkap. Notarius, 13(2), 777–787. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v13i2.31166

Tomsa, D. (2015). Local politics and corruption in Indonesia’s outer islands. Bijdragen Tot de Taal, Land- en Volkenkunde, 171(2), 196–219. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-17101005

Umar. (2017). Pendekatan social exchange perspektif George C. Homans. Tajdid: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman dan Kemanusiaan, 1(1), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.52266/tadjid.v1i1.5

Utomo, W. (2008). Fraud control plan: Sebuah solusi. Paraikatte, 1(3), 6–7.

Villanueva, P. A. G. (2018). Institutional change, corruption and e-government transformation in the Philippines: The Benigno Simeon Aquino III administration. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(3), 463–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.07.015

Wibowo, A. (2020). Penentuan kriteria unsur penyalahgunaan wewenang dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi (studi putusan pengadilan). Jurnal Yuridis, 7(1), 120–148. https://doi.org/10.35586/jyur.v7i1.1025

Wibowo, H. Y. (2021). Critical review pendaftaran tanah sistematis di Indonesia sampai tahun 2024. Elipsoida: Jurnal Geodesi dan Geomatika, 4(2), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.14710/elipsoida.2021.15156

Wirawan, V. (2020). Tindak pidana korupsi dalam bidang pertanahan di Indonesia (Suatu kajian kritis terhadap program pendaftaran tanah sistematis lengkap) (Master's thesis, Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta).

Wirawan, V. (2021). Tindak pidana perpajakan dalam pembuatan dan pendaftaran surat keterangan waris. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 15(3), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2021.V15.489-508

Wirawan, V., & Ngatiyah, A. Z. (2023). Influence of the land mafia on economic development in Indonesia. Changjiang Liuyu Ziyuan Yu Huanjing, 39(2), 1545–1553.

Wirawan, V., Yusriyadi, Silviana, A., & Widowaty, Y. (2024). Measuring the land mafia in Indonesia: New phenomenon of extraordinary crime. Novum Jus, 18(1), 311–353. https://doi.org/10.14718/NovumJus.2024.18.1.11

Wiyata, R. W. S., Yusuf, H., Aprita, S., & Mahfuz, A. L. (2023). Problems of law enforcement against civil servants involved in corruption cases of the complete systematic land program in Palembang city. International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research, 11(2), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.35335/ijopsor.v11i2.165

Yanto, O. (2020). Negara hukum: Kepastian, keadilan dan kemanfaatan hukum (Dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia) (Cet. I). Pustaka Reka Cipta.

Yustia, D. A., & Arifin, F. (2022). Bureaucratic reform as an effort to prevent corruption in Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2166196

Zaidan, M. A. (2016). Kebijakan kriminal. Sinar Grafika.

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Wirawan, V., Ngatiyah, A. Z., Novianto, V., Widowaty, Y., & Setiyawan, D. (2026). LEGAL POLICY FOR RESOLVING LAND CORRUPTION IN INDONESIA: PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 14(1), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol14no1.1183