CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF AUDITORS FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Authors

  • Loganathan Krishnan Department of Business Law & Taxation, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman Kampar Campus (Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman), Jalan Universiti, Bandar Barat, 31900 Kampar, Perak

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol2no1.32

Abstract

This article discusses the legal position of the auditors in Malaysia under the criminal law. It examines whether the legal principles under this law are able to address the scandals which have emerged in recent years pertaining to auditors. It also investigates whether the legal principles under criminal law impose additional duties and obligations on auditors as opposed to those duties and obligations imposed under the company law. The study finally discusses whether action can be brought against the auditors and the difficulties faced in doing so. These issues are extremely crucial because auditors profession is becoming a high-risk profession. Therefore, principles of criminal law coupled with its intricate rules have to play its role effectively to ensure that the interests of all parties who have a stake in the matter are well-balanced with the role and duties expected of auditors. This study suggests that the current legal framework under criminal law governing auditors must be reassessed in the wake of the scandals involving auditors both in the domestic and international forefront. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Loganathan Krishnan, Department of Business Law & Taxation, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman Kampar Campus (Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman), Jalan Universiti, Bandar Barat, 31900 Kampar, Perak

Department of Business Law & Taxation, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman Kampar Campus (Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman), Jalan Universiti, Bandar Barat, 31900 Kampar, Perak

References

Pauline, Wallace. 1990. Company Law in Hong Kong, 2nd ed. Hong Kong: Butterworths.

Avtar, Singh. 1989. Company Law, 9th ed. Lucknow: Eastern Book Company.

Local firms facing up to corporate crime: PwC, October 25, 2007, New Straits Times.

Carolyn Hong, Fraud hits 62pc of listed firms, June 8, 2001, New Straits Times.

Accountants detained for Satyam probe, January 26, 2009, New Straits Times.

Special fraud team to probe Satyam affair, January 25, 2009, New Straits Times.

Scandal shakes confidence in accounting Big Four, January 9, 2009, New Straits Times.

Satyam future in doubt, January 10, 2009, New Straits Times.

Corporate fraud scandals can detonate anywhere, January 10, New Straits Times.

CM: Priority is to protect jobs, January 12, 2009, New Straits Times.

Satyam may seek bailout, tap clients for cash, January 13, 2009, New Straits Times.

Satyam board dissolved, 3 in custody, January 11, 2009, New Straits Times.

Satyam: Malaysia a critical pillar, January 9, 2009, New Straits Times.

PwC unlikely to see client exodus, January 13, 2009, New Straits Times.

SC wraps up Megan probe, to announce action soon, November 14, 2007, New Straits Times.

Published

2010-08-05

How to Cite

Krishnan, L. (2010). CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF AUDITORS FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 2(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol2no1.32