COURT-ANNEXED MEDIATION IN RESOLVING DISPUTES RELATING TO FAMILY IN MALAYSIA: WHAT WE NEED TO KNOW BEFORE WE GO FORWARD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol2no1.33Abstract
This article aims to, firstly, introduce court-annexed mediation in resolving family disputes in Malaysia. Secondly, it will attempt to identify the advantages and disadvantages of court-annexed mediation to resolve disputes relating to family matters, both in the Syariah and Civil Courts in Malaysia. Thirdly, it will provide recommendations to promote CAM. A study was made on the important aspects pertinent to the conduct of mediation in the form of sulh at the Syariah Courts in the State of Selangor which shares uniformed sulh processes used in other syariah courts from other states. Results of the study indicated that the current implementation of CAM in the Syariah Court is guided by a comprehensive set of statutory rules pertaining to sulh whereas the Civil Court is not guided even by a Mediation Act. In addition to that, the study also showed that there are similarities in terms of mediation process practiced in Majlis Sulh with the recommended practices of mediation.
Downloads
References
Brown, H. and Marriott, A. 1977. ADR Principles and Practice, Sweet & Maxwell, London.
Boulle, Laurence. 2001. Mediation: Skills and Techniques. Australia. Butterworths.
Charlton & Dewdney. 2004. The Mediator’s Handbook. Skills and Strategies for Practitioners. Sydney.
Thomson LawBook Co.p. 340
DeJong, W. 1983. ‘The Use of Mediation and Arbitration in Small Claims Disputes’. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
Galaway, B. ‘Mediation and Criminal Justice: Victim, Offenders, and Communit’y. Newbury Park, California: Sage Press.
Moore, C, 1996. The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
McCrory, J. 1981. “Environment Mediation- Piece for the Puzzle’ Vermont Law Review, Vol. 6 (No.1): p.56.
Mnookin & Korhhauser, 1979. ‘Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of
Divorce’. The Yale Law Journal. Vol. 88. p.959.
Pillai, Kamala. 2009. Family Law in Malaysia. Malaysia, LexisNexis Law Sdn. Bhd.
Su’aida Binti Safei. 2008. “Majlis Sulh (Islamic Mediation) In the Selangor Syariah Court and Malaysian Mediation Centre of the Bar Council: A Comparative Study”. International Seminar on Comparative Law 2008 (ISCOM2008). Putrajaya: USIM. pp. 231-233.
Sheikh Ghazali Haji Abdul Rahman. 2000. “Sulh Dalam Perundangan Islam”. Jurnal Undang-undang IKIM. Kuala Lumpur : Penerbit IKIM. Vol. 4. (No. 2); July-December. pp. 6-8.
Sheikh Ghazali Hj. Ab. Rahman & Others. 2002. Manual Kerja Sulh Mahkamah Syariah / Jabatan Kehakiman Syariah Negeri-negeri Seluruh Malaysia . pp. 12-14.
Sheppard et.el. 1979. National Evaluation of the Neighborhood Justice Centers Field
Test—Interim Report. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
Shonholtz, Raymond. 1993. Justice from another perspective: The ideology and developmental history of the Community Boards Program in Merry, Sally and Milner, Neal, eds. The Possibility of Popular Justice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Goldberg, S.B., Frank E.A. Sanders and Nancy H.Rogers (Ed). 1999. Dispute Resolution: Negotiation, Mediation and other processes.Aspine Law & Business, Gaithesburg and New York.
Vasanthi,A., 2000. Mediation of Family Disputes. /NSAF, The Journal of the Malaysian Bar,. Vol. XXX (No.4): pp.45.
W. Mcthentia, A.W. & Thomas L. Shaffer, T.L.1985. For reconciliation. The Yale Law Journal, p.1664.
Statutes:
Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976 (Act 164).
Domestic Violence Act 1994 (Act 521).
Adoption Act 1952 (Act 257).
Penal Code (Act 574).
Syariah Court Civil Procedure (State of Selangor) Enactment 2003.
Syariah Court Civil Procedure (Sulh) Federal Territory Rules 2004.
Syariah Court Civil Procedure (Sulh) Melaka Rules 2004.
Civil Procedure Rule (Sulh) Selangor 2001.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 Norman Zakiyy Chow Jen-T'chiang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.