THE EXISTENCE OF NAGARI IN WEST SUMATRA ON STATE POLICY HEGEMONY

Aulia Rahmat; Esmi Warassih; Muhamad Syamsudin

doi:10.33102/mjsl.vol11no2.452

Authors

Aulia Rahmat Faculty of Syari'ah, Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2289-5127
Esmi Warassih Emeritus Professor, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0857-0812
Muhamad Syamsudin Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8279-3179

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol11no2.452

Keywords:

Constitutional Law, Minangkabau, Customary Law, Adat, Social Order, Nagari

Abstract

The Minangkabau community in West Sumatra employs a social system referred to as nagari. The term nagari should be defined to describe an administrative body that serves the lowest level of government bureaucratic duties in West Sumatra. The Dutch East Indies attempted to colonize Nagari, and as a result, the system of government encountered a number of transformations. The nagari faced different attitudes in each government regime during the independence era, which was similar to what occurred then. This research investigates Nagari’s dynamics and existence in state legal systems. This paper juxtaposes the official postures of different governments concerning the existence of Nagari. It is noteworthy that Nagari not only has at the grassroots level of governance but also functions as an institutionalization of the significance of interpersonal connections within the Minangkabau social order. This research utilizes an applied socio-legal methodology to examine the configuration of state law and its consequences for Nagari as a legal subject. The research findings indicate that Nagari, which represents the institutionalization of the Minangkabau social order, has undergone bureaucratization and instrumentalization since the colonial period. The bureaucratization of the Nagari has left a major trauma for Minangkabau political authority which is reflected in the structure and organization of the Nagari. The understanding of Nagari within the Minangkabau community has been impacted by the influence and dominance of governmental policies, resulting in challenges for rapid progress in reconstruction endeavors. The state must reduce domination and hegemony over the nagari in the process of establishing regulations governing the nagari.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, T. (1970). Some notes on the Kaba Tjindua Mato: an example of Minangkabau traditional literature. Indonesia, 9, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/3350620 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3350620

Abdullah, T. (1977). Schools and politics: the Kaum Muda movement in West Sumatera (1927-1933). Itacha: Cornell University Press.

Adli, H., & Mutalib, M. H. A. (2020). Tantangan Pemerintah Daerah dalam penyusunan peraturan daerah desa adat : Upaya dalam penetapan Desa Adat di Indragiri Hulu, Riau. Indonesian Journal of Religion and Society, 2(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.36256/ijrs.v2i1.80 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36256/ijrs.v2i1.80

Agesti, N., & Sanjaya, A. (2021). Perjuangan Hj. Rangkayo Rasuna Said sebagai pejuang politik dan pemikir pergerakan pada masa pra kemerdekaan. Kalpataru: Jurnal Sejarah dan Pembelajaran Sejarah, 7(2), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.31851/kalpataru.v7i2.7163 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31851/kalpataru.v7i2.7163

Asnan, G. (2006). Pemerintahan Sumatera Barat dari VOC Hingga Reformasi. Yogyakarta: Citra Pustaka.

Asrinaldi. (2017). Demokrasi lokal di Indonesia: otonomi, nagari, dan sosial budaya di Sumatera Barat (Y. Sri, Ed.). Padang: Erka.

Azwar, W., Yunus, Y., Muliono, M., & Permatasari, Y. (2018). Nagari Minangkabau: the study of indigenous institutions in West Sumatra, Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 10(2), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.10.2018.231-239 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.10.2018.231-239

Bachtiar, H. W. (1967). Negeri Taram: A Minangkabau village community. In Koentjaraningrat (Ed.), Villages in Indonesia (pp. 348–385). New York: Cornell University Press.

Benda-Beckmann, F., & Benda-Beckmann, K. von. (2001). Recreating The nagari: decentralization in West Sumatera. Halle/Yalle.

Benda-Beckmann, F., & Benda-Beckmann, K. von. (2013). Political and legal transformations of an Indonesian polity: The nagari from colonisation to decentralisation (Reprinted). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139839082

Benda-Beckmann, F., & Benda-Beckmann, K. von. (2021). Transformasi politik dan hukum di indonesia: nagari dari kolonialisasi hingga desentralisasi (F. I. Thufail & A. Savitri, Eds.). Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Benda-Beckmannn, F., & Benda-Beckmann, K. von. (2007). Ambivalent identities: decentralization and Minangkabau political communities. In H. S. Nordholt & G. van Klinken (Eds.), Renegotiating boundaries: local politics in post-Soeharto Indonesia (pp. 417–442). Leiden: KILTV Press.

Benda-Beckmannn, F., & Benda-Beckmann, K. von. (2011). Changing one is changing all: dynamics in the adat-Islam-state triangle. In S. Irianto & Shidarta (Eds.), Metode penelitian hukum: konstelasi dan refleksi (2nd ed., pp. 215–245). Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Benda-Beckmannn, F., & Benda-Beckmannn, K. von. (2006). Changing one is changing all: dynamics in the adat-islam-state triangle. Journal of legal pluralism and unofficial law, 38(53–54), 239–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2006.10756604 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2006.10756604

Benda, H. J. (1955). Indonesian Islam under the Japanese occupation, 1942-45. Pacific affairs, 28(4), 350–362. https://doi.org/10.2307/3035318 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3035318

Biezeveld, R. (2007). The many roles of adat in West Sumatera. In J. S. Davidson (Ed.), The revival of tradition in Indonesian politics (Routledge, pp. 203–223). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203965498 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203965498

Bowen, J. R. (2003). Islam, law, and equality in Indonesia: An anthropology of public reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615122

Bukido, R., Rumkel, N., Wekke, I. S., & Palm, E. (2018). Customary law of Larwul Ngabal in the implementation of regional autonomy in North Moluccas. Hasanuddin law review, 4(2), 242–255. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v4i2.1351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v4i2.1351

Daerah, P. I. dan D. K. (1984). Sejarah pengaruh pelita terhadap kehidupan masyarakat pedesaan daerah Sumatera Barat. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Dahlan, M. (2018). Rekognisi hak masyarakat hukum adat dalam Konstitusi. Undang: jurnal hukum, 1(2), 187–217. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.1.2.187-217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.1.2.187-217

De Jong, P. E. J. (1980). Minangkabau and Negri Sembilan: socio-political structure in Indonesia. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8198-0

Dobbin, C. (2008). Gejolak ekonomi, kebangkitan Islam, dan Gerakan Padri: Minangkabau 1784-1847 (L. D. Tedjasidhana & F. Nurdiasih, Eds.). Depok: Komunitas Bambu.

Drakard, J. (1993). A kingdom of words: Minangkabau sovereignty in Sumatran history. Australian National University.

Fuller, L. L. (1964). The morality of law. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Furnivall, J. S. (2010). Netherlands India: a study of plural economy (Digital). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511707964

Graves, E. E. (2007). Asal-usul elite Minangkabau modern: respon terhadap Kolonial Belanda abad XIX-XX. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Hadler, J. (2008). A historiography of violence and the secular state in Indonesia: Tuanku Imam Bondjol and the uses of history. The journal of Asian studies, 67(3), 971–1010. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911808001228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911808001228

Hadler, J. (2010). Sengketa tiada putus: matriarkat, reformisme Islam, dan kolonialisme di Minangkabau (S. Berlian, Ed.). Jakarta: Freedom Institute.

Hamka. (1968). Adat Minangkabau dan harta pusakanja. In M. Naim (Ed.), Menggali hukum tanah dan hukum waris Minangkabau (pp. 19–48). Padang: Center for Minangkabau Studies.

Hanani, S., & Aziz, R. A. (2009). Rekonstruksi dan usaha penyelamatan tradisi lokal era pasca sentralisme di Indonesia. Geografia - Malaysian journal of society and space, 5(2), 68–81. Retrieved from http://ejournal.ukm.my/gmjss/article/view/17905.

Herwandi. (2012). Angku Lareh: pribumi pejabat Kolonial Belanda di Sumatera Barat abad XIX. Padang: Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Andalas.

Hoekema, A. (2017). The conundrum of cross-cultural understanding in the practice of law. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 49(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2017.1310446 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2017.1310446

Holzinger, K., Haer, R., Bayer, A., Behr, D. M., & Neupert-Wentz, C. (2019). The constitutionalization of indigenous group rights, traditional political institutions, and customary law. Comparative Political Studies, 52(12), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018774347 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018774347

Irawan, B., & Hanida, R. P. (2020). Dari luhak ke rantau: kronik pemekaran dan penggabungan nagari. Padang: Rancak Publik.

isra, s., ferdi, & tegnan, h. (2017). rule of law and human rights challenges in Southeast Asia: a case study of legal pluralism in Indonesia. Hasanuddin Law Review, 3(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v3i2.1081 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v3i2.1081

Kahin, A. (1985). The impact of the independence struggle on Minangkabau society. In L.L. Thomas & F. von Benda-Beckmann (Eds.), Change and continuity in Minangkabau: local, regional, and historical perspectives on West Sumatera (pp. 303–320). Athens: Ohio University Center for International Studies.

Kahin, A. (1999). From rebellion to integration: West Sumatera and Indonesia polity 1926-1998. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Kathirithamby-Wells, J. (1985). Myth and reality: Minangkabau institutional traditions in the rantau. In Lyun L. Thomas & F. von Benda-Beckmann (Eds.), Change and continuity in Minangkabau: local, regional, and historical perspectives on West Sumatera (pp. 121–140). Ohio: Ohio University.

Kato, T. (1982). Matriliny and migration: envolving Minangkabau traditions in Indonesia. London: Cornell University Press.

Kemal, I. (2009). Pemerintahan nagari Minangkabau dan perkembangannya: Tinjauan tentang Kerapatan Adat. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Khan, J. S. (2007). Minangkabau social formations: Indonesian peasants and the world economy. London: Cambridge University Press.

Koto, A. (2012). Persatuan Tarbiyah Islamiyah: sejarah, paham keagamaan, dan pemikiran politik 1945-1970. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Lev, D. S. (1973). Judicial unification in post-colonial Indonesia. Indonesia, 16, 1–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3350645

Lev, D. S. (2000). Judicial unification in post-colonial Indonesia. In D. S. Lev (Ed.), Legal evolution and political authority in Indonesia: Selected Essays (pp. 33–70). The Hauge: Kluwer Law International. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004478701_005

Lukito, R. (1998). Islamic law and Adat encounter: The experience of Indonesia. Jakarta: INIS.

Lukito, R. (1999). Law and politics in post-independence Indonesia: A case study of religious and Adat coutrs. Studia Islamika: Indonesian Journal for Islamic Studies, 6(2), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v6i2.731 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v6i2.731

Matuankotta, J. K. (2020). Pengakuan dan perlindungan hukum terhadap eksistensi pemerintahan Adat. SASI, 26(2), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i2.305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i2.305

Moyer, D. S. (1975). The logic of the laws: A structural analysis of Malay language legal codes from Bengkulu. The Hauge: Martinus Nijhoff. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004287068

Navis, A. A. (1984). Alam terkembang jadi guru: Adat dan kebudayaan Minangkabau. Jakarta: Grafitipers.

Oki, A. (1977). Social change in the West Sumatran Village: 1908-1945 (Australian National University). https://doi.org/10.25911/5d74e0b56e7ed

Parlindungan, M. O. (1970). Kata sambutan. In M. D. Mansoer (Ed.), Sedjarah Minangkabau (pp. i–xv). Jakarta: Brathara.

Pistorius, A. W. P. V. (1871). Studien over de inlandsche huishouding in de Padangsche Bovenlanden. Zalt-Bommel: Joh. Noman en Zoon.

Rahardjo, S. (2005). Hukum Adat dalam negara kesatuan Republik Indonesia: Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum. In H. Rosyida & Bisariyadi (Eds.), Inventarisasi dan Perlindungan Hak Masyarakat Hukum Adat. Jakarta: Komnas HAM, MKRI, Depdagri.

Rahmat, A. (2013). Rekonstruksi pemerintahan Nagari era otonomi daerah (1st ed.). Malang, ID: PKBM Ngudi Ilmu.

Rahmat, A. (2020). Rekognisi dan reposisi dalam asimilasi hukum lama di Nagari (baru) Sumatera Barat. Indonesia Journal of Religion and Society, 2(2), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.36256/ijrs.v2i2.106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36256/ijrs.v2i2.106

Rosyada, A., Warassih, E., & Herawati, R. (2018). Perlindungan konstitusional terhadap kesatuan masyarakat hukum adat dalam mewujudkan keadilan sosial. Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 20(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v20i1.10021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v20i1.10021

Sally, W. (2013). Rasuna Said: Lioness of the Indonesian independence movement. Singapore: NUS.

Shalihin, N. (2014). Demokrasi di Nagarinya Para Tuan (1st ed.). Padang: Imam Bonjol Press.

Sulaiman, Adli, M., & Mansur, T. M. (2019). Ketidakteraturan hukum pengakuan dan perlindungan masyarakat hukum adat di Indonesia. Law Reform, 15(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v15i1.23352 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v15i1.23352

Tanner, N. (1971). Minangkabau Disputes. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Vel, J. A. C., & Bedner, A. W. (2015). Decentralisation and village governance in Indonesia : the Return to the Nagari and the 2014 Village Law. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 47(3), 493–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2015.1109379 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2015.1109379

Von Benda-Beckmann, K. (2014). Ambivalent identities: Decentralization and Minangkabau political communities. Renegotiating Boundaries, 417–442. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004260436_019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004260436_019

Wardiono, G., Sugiarto, B., & Rofik, A. (2020). Gerakan syarikat Islam kembali ke khittah tahun 1905. Jurnal Politik Profetik, 8(2), 218–239. https://doi.org/10.24252/profetik.v8i2a2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/profetik.v8i2a2

Westenenk, L. C. (1913). De Minang Kabausche Nagari. Padang: Winkel Mantachappij v/h P. Baumer & co.

Wignjosoebroto, S. (1994). Dari Hukum Kolonial ke Hukum Nasional. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Wiguna, M. O. C. (2021). Pemikiran hukum progresif untuk perlindungan hukum dan kesejahteraan masyarakat hukum Adat. Jurnal Konstitusi, 18(1), 112–137. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1816 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1816

Yunaldi, W. (2021). Nagari & Negara: Perspektif otentik kesatuan masyarakat hukum adat dalam ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Jual Buku Sastra.