THEFT PUNISHMENT IN ISLAMIC LAW AND INDONESIAN CRIMINAL LAW: INITIATIVE FOR HARMONIZATION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF SHARUR’S BOUNDARY THEORY

Aroma Elmina Martha; Agus Triyanta; Bayu Mogana Putra

doi:10.33102/mjsl.vol12no2.663

Authors

Aroma Elmina Martha Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Indonesia Jl. Kaliurang KM 14,5 Sleman 55584 Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2338-1872
Agus Triyanta Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Indonesia Jl. Kaliurang KM 14,5 Sleman 55584 Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Bayu Mogana Putra Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Indonesia Jl. Kaliurang KM 14,5 Sleman 55584 Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1162-3707

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol12no2.663

Keywords:

Theft punishment, Islamic law, Indonesia criminal law, Sharur

Abstract

This study seeks to find a formula on how Islamic law contributes to Indonesian criminal law reform, particularly in the imposition of theft, by utilizing Sharur's Boundary Theory (Naẓariyyah al-Ḥudūd). This field of research is considered imperative because the implementation of Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2012 concerning Adjustments to the Limits on Misdemeanor Crimes and the Number of Fines in the Criminal Code (Misdemeanor Crimes) is felt to have not been maximized. This study uses normative juridical research methods, with descriptive-qualitative analysis. It can be deducted from this study that the theory of the boundaries of the ijtihad area determines the punishment in Islamic. The punishment for the crime of theft, the amputation of the hands mentioned in the Qur'an, is the maximum form of punishment. Thus, it is possible that there are punishment in other forms that fall under the category of cutting off one's hand, based on several verses of the Qur’an, including in Al-Māʾidah 5:38, al-Isrāʾ 17:33, al-Baqarah 2:178, and al-Nisāʾ 4:92. Even though this opinion may raise objections, for the purposes of reforming Indonesian Criminal Law, it is suggested that this opinion is still relevant for consideration. The study emphasizes the significance of understanding and considering Sharur's boundary theory for judges to make informed decisions in Sentencing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arliman, L. (2015). Penegakan hukum dan kesadaran masyarakat. Deepublish.

Babbie, E. R. (1998). The practice of social research. Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Baried, R. R. (2017). Hubungan penerapan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 dengan keadilan bagi terdakwa (kajian terhadap putusan pengadilan mengenai perkara pencurian ringan). Jurnal Yuridis, 4(1), 84-97.

Billah, M. (2019). Pendekatan bahasa dalam teori Muhammad Syahrur. TA’LIMUNA, 9(1), 71-85.

Juliansyahzen, M. I. (2022). Rekonstruksi nalar hukum Islam kontemporer Muhammad Shahrur dan kontekstualisasinya. Al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH), 4(1), 57–74.

Madari, M. S. K. (2013). Penyesuaian batasan tindak pidana ringan dan jumlah denda dalam KUHP terhadap perkara tindak pidana pencurian (Analisis Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 tentang penyesuaian tindak pidana ringan dan jumlah denda dalam KUHP). Jurnal Cita Hukum, 1(2), 235-250.

Moch. As’at Sa. (2012). Teori Batas Hukuman Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dalam Pemikiran Muhammad Syahrur. IN RIGHT: Jurnal Agama dan Hak Azazi Manusia, 1(2), 495-516.

Mustaqim, A. (2017). Teori hudud Muhammad Syahrur dan kontribusinya dalam penafsiran Alquran. Al-Quds: Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis, 1(1), 1-26.

Nadhifuddin, A. (2018). Tindak pidana pencurian menurut Muhammad Syahrur dan relevansinya di era modern. Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, 4(2), 268-300.

Ridwan, J., & Sudrajat, A. S. (2020). Hukum administrasi negara dan kebijakan layanan publik. Penerbit Nuansa Cendikia.

Slamet, K. G. (2004). Harmonisasi hukum dalam perspektif perundang-undangan. Jurnal Hukum, 11(27), 81-96.

Sofyan, & Suleman, Z. (2020). Ushul fiqh: Dari nalar kreatif menuju nalar progresif. Inteligensia Media.

Sulistyawan, A. Y. (2019). Urgensi harmonisasi hukum nasional terhadap perkembangan hukum global akibat globalisasi. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 7(2), 171-181.

Vyver, J. D. van der. (2010). Prosecuting terrorism in international tribunals. Emory International Law Review, 24(2), 527-548.

Wahab, A. J. (2019). Islam radikal dan moderat: Diskursus dan kontestasi varian Islam Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo.

Yuhendri, E. (2019). Muhammad Syahrur: Theory of limit (teori batas). Tajdidukasi: Jurnal Penelitian & Kajian Pendidikan Islam, 9(1), 29-34.

Zuyyina, C. K., Aswadi, & Muchasan, A. (2022). Kontribusi Pemikiran Muhammad Syahrur Tentang Teori Hudud Dalam Pembaruan Pemikiran Islam. Salimiya: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Keagamaan Islam, 3(4), 73-85.