THE UN ILC’S DRAFT CONCLUSIONS ON THE PEREMPTORY NORMS OF GENERAL INTERNATIONAL LAW: THE TALE OF THE ANNEX

Dire Tladi

doi:10.33102/mjsl.vol12no1.671

Authors

Dire Tladi International Court of Justice, Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, The Netherlands | National Research Foundation (NRF) South African Research Chairs Initiative (SARChI) Chair in International Constitutional Law, University of Pretoria, South Africa https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3378-2873

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol12no1.671

Keywords:

Peremptory norms, jus cogens, International Law Commission, Opinio juris, Customary international law, Draft conclusion

Abstract

This paper examines the implications of the General Assembly's failure to adopt a resolution on the International Law Commission's Draft Conclusions on Peremptory Norms (“Draft Conclusions”) during its seventy-seventh session. While the non-decision does not affect the legal status of the Draft Conclusions, it raises questions about its reception and the underlying reasons for the lack of resolution adoption. The inclusion of an Annex with a non-exhaustive list, particularly addressing the right to self-determination, led to opposition from a subset of States. Despite the strong pedigree of the norms in the Annex, dissenting voices, primarily questioning the status of certain norms, played a pivotal role in the non-decision. This paper contends that the dissenters' success in preventing the adoption of a resolution could prompt the International Law Commission to exercise greater caution in its future work. The Commission may become more inclined to avoid addressing sensitive issues, potentially leading to a tendency to seek the lowest common denominator in its outputs. The analysis delves into the potential impact on the Commission's approach and the broader implications for the development and acceptance of peremptory norms of general international law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonymous. (2010). China and the principle of self-determination of peoples. St Antony’s International Review, 6(1), 79-102.

Brill. (2021). Peremptory norms of General International Law (jus cogens) and the fundamental values of the international community. In Dire Tladi (Ed.), Peremptory Norms of General international Law (Jus Cogens): Disputations and Disquisitions (pp. 141 - 208).

International Law Commission. (2019). Provisional summary record of the 3459th Meeting. (No. A/CN.4/SR.3459). https://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/summary_records/a_cn4_sr3459.pdf

International Law Commission. (2022). Draft Conclusions on Identification and Legal Consequences of Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens), with Commentaries 2022. (No. A/77/10). https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/1_14_2022.pdf

International Law Commission. (2024). Analytical guide to the work of the International Law Commission. (A/CN.4/748). https://legal.un.org/Ilc/guide/1_14.shtml

Kadelbach, S. (2016). Genesis, function and identification of jus cogens norms. In: Heijer, M., van der Wilt, H. (eds) Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 2015. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, vol 46. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-114-2_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-114-2_6

Loper, K. (2003). The right to self-determination: Recent developments in International Law and their relevance for the Tibetan people. Hong Kong Law Journal, 33, 167-197.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs Malaysia. (2022). Statement (6c) : Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its seventy-third session (Agenda Item 77) - Cluster Ii. https://www.kln.gov.my/web/usa_un-new-york/news-from-mission/-/blogs/statement-6c-r?_33_redirect=%2Fweb%2Fusa_un-new-york%2Fspeeches%3Fp_p_auth%3D5XpBaA62%26p_p_id%3D49%26p_p_lifecycle%3D1%26p_p_state%3Dnormal%26p_p_mode%3Dview%26_49_struts_action%3D%252Fmy_sites%252Fview%26_49_groupId%3D34682%26_49_privateLayout%3Dfalse

Nairobi. (2022, August 11). “Cameroon: Army killings, disappearances, in North-West Region investigate and prosecute abusive security forces”. Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/08/11/cameroon-army-killings-disappearances-north-west-region

Santalla Vargas, E. (2016). In quest of the practical value of jus cogens norms. In: Heijer, M., van der Wilt, H. (eds) Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 2015. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, vol 46. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-114-2_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-114-2_8

Shelton, D. (2016). Sherlock Holmes and the mystery of jus cogens. In: Heijer, M., van der Wilt, H. (eds) Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 2015. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, vol 46. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-114-2_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-114-2_2

Tladi, D. (2019). The ILC’s Draft Conclusions on Peremptory Norms of General International Law: Personal reflections of the special rapporteur. Austrian Review of International and European Law, 24, 121-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15736512-02401010

Tladi, D. (2020). The International Law Commission’s Draft Conclusions on Peremptory Norms of General International Law (jus cogens): Making wine from water or more water than wine. Nordic Journal of International Law, 89(2), 1-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718107-bja10007

United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. (2022, August 31). “OHCHR Assessment of human rights concerns in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, People’s Republic of China”: United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/country-reports/ohchr-assessment-human-rights-concerns-xinjiang-uyghur-autonomous-region

United Nations. (2019). Report of the International Law Commission. (No. 10). https://legal.un.org/ilc/reports/2019/english/a_74_10_advance.pdf

United Nations. (2022, March 2). “General Assembly overwhelmingly adopts resolution demanding Russian Federation immediately end illegal use of force in Ukraine, Withdraw All Troops”. Meetings Coverage and Press Releases. https://press.un.org/en/2022/ga12407.doc.htm

United Nations. (2022, October 27). “Sixth Committee Speakers debate draft texts on Protection of Environment in Armed Conflict, as International Law Commission’s Cluster 1 Review concludes”. United Nations. https://press.un.org/en/2022/gal3671.doc.htm

United Nations. (2022, October). “Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its seventy-third session (Agenda item 77)”: General Assembly of the United Nations. United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/ga/sixth/77/ilc.shtml

United Nations. (2023, June). “Sixth Committee (Legal) – 77th Session”: General Assembly of he United Nations. United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/ga/sixth/77/summaries.shtml